Friday, April 6, 2018


Our Mayflower Line: The Fullers, Lathrops, Bonhams, and Lippingtons



Redenhall Parish Church, oldest portion dating to 1319

Having already noted that Thomas South’s wife Dorothy Lippinton/Lippington (1683-aft.1757)6xggm is our link to the Mayflower Passengers Edward and Samuel Fuller, I will start to trace her lines back. Julia Griffin covered much of this territory very well in her Thanksgiving document, so bear with me as I travel over some of that ground again.

Robert Fuller (1543-1613) 11xggf was born in Redenhall Parish, Norfolk, England, and there is a baptismal record for Oct.6 of that year. His father was John Fuller (~1510-1559) and although his mother has been suggested as Ann Collinge, there is not agreement among researchers on that. Parish records show that Robert married Sarah Dunkhorne (1551-1584) 11xggm in nearby Starston Parish on January 29, 1572. Robert is recorded as a yeoman and a butcher. He and Sarah had seven children before Sarah passed in 1584, and he then married Frances (possibly Blackwell) and had four children with her. There are church baptismal records for all eleven children, but it is his second son Edward and grandson Samuel who will take our line to America. His will of May 19, 1614, proved later that month on his death, demonstrates that he was prosperous and owned considerable property. The will mentions wife Frances; living sons Thomas, Edward, and Samuel, and several daughters. Thomas and Edward are left both money and property, with Samuel only inheriting money, leading researchers to conclude that Thomas and Edward were living locally, while Samuel was perhaps living elsewhere [Leiden?]. It is not known if Robert was a Separatist or Puritan, but the county of Norfolk and the area of East Anglia were known as strongholds for Puritanism. Robert was on a list of donors for a church bell in the Redenhall church tower, but that is the only indication, along with baptismal records for each child, that indicates anything about his religion. 

There is a researcher at Portland State University, David Evans, with a well-documented and interesting website devoted to his family genealogy, and we have the good fortune to share his descent from the Fullers of Redenhall and to be able to share his work on them. He asserts that the Fullers had “probably” lived in Redenhall Parish for several centuries and works Redenhall history back to various Celtic tribes, the Angles (think Anglo-Saxon Germanic tribes) in post-Roman times, the Viking invaders of the 9th and 10th centuries, with peace finally settling in East Anglia in the 11th century, allowing Redenhall to become the one of the chief sources of wool for England and much of Europe. Redenhall, a small parish about 4 miles wide and 1.25 miles long, is near the Waveney River and the small city of Harleston. Redenhall’s name derives from Rada, owner of a tract of about 700 acres including Redenhall recorded in the 1086 Domesday or Doomsday Book, an amazingly thorough survey of England commissioned by William the Conqueror.

Evans, relying on William Hyslop Fuller’s 1908 Genealogy of Some Descendants of Edward Fuller of the Mayflower and other sources, takes the Fullers back through a number of Johns and Williams to around 1427, all in the Redenhall parish.

Evans also provides a concise overview of the Reformation and the history that led to the Pilgrims leaving England for Holland, and then Holland for America. I will summarize:

England became nominally Protestant under the Tudor King Henry VIII, whose motivations for establishing the Church of England were personal, so he could marry Anne Boleyn, and political, to take away the power of the Pope and seize the assets of monasteries and clerical properties within England, but do not appear to have been theological. However, Protestant sympathizers in the realm were likely heartened and hoped to “purify” the new Church of England back to the faith of the New Testament without what they saw as Catholic distortions.  Henry’s son Edward VI did begin to make some changes in ritual, but when his sister Mary, a Catholic, ascended the throne on his death, the authority of the Pope was restored for a brief time before Elizabeth I came to the throne and allowed many Protestants who had fled England to return. She wanted an outward uniformity and developed the 39 Articles, making the Church of England more of a nationalistic, political compromise. Extreme Protestants who were under the influence of John Calvin and other reformers during their exile were not satisfied with her compromises, and soon conflict developed within the Church of England between those glad to see a calm status quo and those who wanted more “purification.” During Elizabeth’s long reign there was tolerance for a variety of conflicting beliefs, but all had to belong to the Church of England. After James I became King on Elizabeth’s death, there was much less tolerance and for differences. Puritanism gained support unless the reformers formed their own congregations outside the official Church; that could result in penalties as harsh as imprisonment and execution.  In 1606 some Puritan Separatists from Scrooby in Nottinghamshire who were meeting outside the Church began to feel the scrutiny of authorities and decided to leave the country, illegal without permission of the King’s Privy Council.  Betrayed by the seamen on their first attempt to flee to Holland, and imprisoned for a short time, they finally succeeded in 1608 and reached Amsterdam; many Separatists followed. In 1609 John Robinson led a group of about one hundred to Leiden.

Charles Edward Banks in his 1962 book The English ancestry and homes of the Pilgrim Fathers who came to Plymouth on the “Mayflower in 1620, the “Fortune” in 1621, and the “Anne” and the “Little James” in 1623 (available online from the Hathitrust), says that the Dutch records show that the group in Leiden/Leyden eventually was around 300, and that many of them were single people who did not start families until their time in Holland; forty-five marriages took place during the Separatists’ time in Holland. He also emphasizes that most were from the yeoman or working class, as were the Fullers, sons of a butcher, although Robert’s older son Samuel, who also traveled on the Mayflower, was educated as a doctor. Something unusual Banks relates is that beginning in 1618, the English made a clear effort at population control by sending children without families to America. Only seven minors onboard the Mayflower were not the children of passengers, accepted by adult passengers as servants or wards, but two hundred English orphan children had already been sent to Virginia before 1620. (Banks 1-7)

Evans continues his explanation of how the Mayflower voyage came about:
They lived there [Holland] in peace for about a decade and were joined by others, [one of whom, sometime after 1614, was Edward Fuller (1575-1621) (10xggf)]. By 1617 many began to consider a move elsewhere, since Holland was densely populated and most found themselves in worse economic circumstances than in England because it was difficult for foreigners to join the trade guilds. They worried about preserving English for their children, and found the Dutch not just tolerant of religious differences, but as the years passed, too much of an influence on their children. They began to make negotiations with Thomas Weston of London, an agent for a group of investors who wanted settlements in America for profits. Under the Virginia Company of Plymouth, a royal chartered stock company, they agreed to work for seven years to pay off the debts they would incur to the “Merchant Adventurers.” Two ships, the Mayflower under Christopher Jones, and a smaller ship, the Speedwell, were purchased and outfitted in Holland, and the Speedwell departed for Southampton in July. Between troubles negotiating last-minute terms and troubles with the Speedwell leaking, some left and returned to Holland. This created a need for more settlers, and people were found to join the group, most of whom were not “saints” as the Puritan Separatists referred to themselves in later documents, but were “strangers” who likely joined the group to make their fortunes in a new land. The Mayflower did not get off until September, a delay that thrust them into fall Atlantic storms and put them in Plymouth Colony (not Virginia as planned) in wintry December.

Replica of the Mayflower, Mayflower II

 Resources 

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Domesday-Book  article on Doomsday or Domesday Book
http://users.stlcc.edu/mfuller/redenhall.html Website with many pictures of Redenhall church 
http://web.pdx.edu/~davide/gene/Fuller_Edward.htm       Part of the Evans work

To be continued...

No comments:

Post a Comment