The
Hulls: Reverend Joseph Hull (1594-1665) 8xggf, Hopewell Hull (1636-1693) 8xggf,
Samuel Hull Sr. (1649-1734) 7xggf, Samuel Hull Jr. (1703-1661) 6xggf
Crewkerne,
Somerset, England
Reverend Joseph Hull (1594-1665) 8xggf
Joseph Hull was
born in April,1594, in Crewkerne, Somerset, to Thomas Hull, a yeoman, and Joane
Peson/Pysing Hull. He graduated from St. Mary’s Hall, Oxford, in November,1614.
He then studied theology and worked under his brother William Hull, vicar of
Colyton in Devon. He married during this time, traditionally said to be to a Joanna,
but the website for the Hull Society of America has an interesting page of
mistakes often made with the Joseph Hull line which says there is no proof for
that. In 1619 Joseph was ordained a clergyman for the Church of England by the
bishop at Exeter, Devon, but the first record of his being a rector was in 1621
at the village of Northleigh, about four miles from Colyton, where he would
serve for eleven years. In 1629 the wardens of Crewkerne were “presented” for
allowing him to preach there without signing the Book of Strange Preachers.
[Let’s don’t go there.] In 1632 Joseph resigned at Northleigh and returned home
to Crewkerne. His first wife died, leaving him with several young children.
Cole states that he married Agnes Hunt in 1633, but the Hull Family of America mistakes
page says only the name Agnes for the second wife holds water. Joseph was
apparently willing to preach anywhere, for he was continually in trouble for
preaching “illegally.” At Glastonbury, he was quoted as saying that “judgement
hung over the land, and that first it would fall on the clergy, and then the
laity.”
In February,1635,
he was expelled from the Church of England for failing to appear before the
church court. The next month he gathered 106 followers, and with his wife and
seven children, they boarded a ship to Massachusetts. They arrived in Boston
early in May, and in July was allowed by the court in Boston to “sit down” in
Wessaguscus with twenty-one families. Wessaguscus had been a failed colony up
to that time. It had been attempted to settle the colony as early as 1622, but
the group which Weston, the Londoner who arranged things for the Mayflower settlers, was trying for
profits and sent a group without the cohesion provided by families and the
Separatists/Pilgrims’ need for religious freedom. Problems arose when things
got so dire that the colonists began to steal from the Indians, leading to
hostilities and eventually the intervention of the Massachusetts Bay Colony. By
the time Joseph Hull arrived with the 21 families, the settlement was quite
small, and the Hull contingent doubled its size, and changed the name to Weymouth,
which became a town with municipal rights and representation in the General
Court. A church was formed with Hull as its pastor.
Joseph Hull did not please the Puritan leaders of Governor Winthrop’s Massachusetts Bay Colony. His teachings were not conservative enough, leaning more toward Episcopalians or Anglicans than Puritans. He had left England, so they expected him to be a Puritan Separatist, but he was not. In 1636 Hull moved to Nantasket, a part of Hingham. He took the oath of Freeman of the Massachusetts Bay Colony on Sept. 2, 1636, allowing him civil participation. In 1638 he was elected a deputy of the General Court for settling “small causes.” He twice represented Hingham as representative to the General Court (assembly). He was a religious and political enemy of Winthrop and considered very “contentious.” He seemed to side with the few Anglican residents, and was expelled from the colony in 1639.
Joseph Hull did not please the Puritan leaders of Governor Winthrop’s Massachusetts Bay Colony. His teachings were not conservative enough, leaning more toward Episcopalians or Anglicans than Puritans. He had left England, so they expected him to be a Puritan Separatist, but he was not. In 1636 Hull moved to Nantasket, a part of Hingham. He took the oath of Freeman of the Massachusetts Bay Colony on Sept. 2, 1636, allowing him civil participation. In 1638 he was elected a deputy of the General Court for settling “small causes.” He twice represented Hingham as representative to the General Court (assembly). He was a religious and political enemy of Winthrop and considered very “contentious.” He seemed to side with the few Anglican residents, and was expelled from the colony in 1639.
Plaque
in Barnstable recognizing Hull’s home and Thomas Dimmock [a name we will hear
again]
Hull moved to
the more tolerant Plymouth Bay Colony, and even received a grant for settling Barnstable.
He is said to have preached the first sermon in Barnstable. We might suspect
that John Lothropp’s entry into Barnstable from Scituate was not just
coincidental, but planned as a means to move Hull out. It worked. Hull ceased
all ministerial functions after Lothropp arrived. After about a year, Hull
moved to Yarmouth and served as minister there. He had not notified the Barnstable
church that he was doing that, so he was excommunicated from the Barnstable
church.
Thereafter Hull
became a sort of itinerant minister, moving from place to place, eventually
living and preaching in Accomenticus/York, Maine, as well as in the Isles of
Shoals, off the Maine coast, where there was no resident clergyman. Lois
Williams in her book Religion at the
Isles of Shoals: Anglicans, Puritans, Missionaries, UUs, and UCCs says that
Hull “an early Church of England clergyman at York…occasionally visited the
islands where he preached and administered the Holy Sacraments. In this Hull
ran little risk of being disciplined, for he lived in the province of Maine
which stoutly support Episcopalian and royalist friends.” (10-11). Eventually,
however, around 1650 the Massachusetts Bay Colony brought Maine under their
jurisdiction, and replaced Hull with a Puritan minister. The Hull family
returned to England.
St.
Buryan in Cornwall
In England Hull
was given a parish at St. Buryan in Cornwall, and the family stayed there for
more than a decade. Hull was eventually ejected from the parish after the 1660 Restoration
of Charles II as king after Cromwell’s Commonwealth ended; there was again a
greater emphasis on adhering to Church of England rules, with many ministers
ejected from their parishes. Hull and his family returned to the colonies, staying
briefly in Oyster River (now Durham), New Hampshire, before returning to the
Isles of Shoals in 1663. He replaced his Puritan replacement there. Hull died
Nov.19, 1665.
Isles
of Shoals off the coast of Maine
The Isles of Shoals are a granite cluster of nine islands
less than ten miles off the New Hampshire coast at the mouth of the Piscatagua
River and the inlet leading to Portsmouth. The largest island, Hog Island,
accounts for almost half of the 200 acres that comprise the Shoals. In the
early colonial period the Shoals prospered as a commercial hub. Commercial
sailing vessels arriving along the Maine/New Hampshire coast, in search of such
New World commodities as timber and furs, saved valuable time and avoided the
dangers of a mainland coast approach by anchoring off the Isle of Shoals where
goods could be loaded and unloaded by coastal shuttles. Between 1621 and 1623,
a certain David Thompson convinced many fishermen to relocate to the Shoals in
that they lay closer to the cod fishing grounds by six to twenty miles than the
mainland. Another advantage to the Shoals was their relative remoteness
provided security from attack by local indigenous peoples and hands-on control
by the colonial magistrates. At one time the Shoals supported a population of
between 200 to 600 people. Appledore Township had a fresh water supply from
rainwater collected in the granite fissures of its 70' elevation. The island's
top soil, however, was very thin and not agriculturally viable. In the 1680's
Appledore Township was abolished.
I spent some
time with a website by Laurence Cook, which provided some good information on
the Reformation movements in Britain that might help explain why Joseph Hull,
not a real firebrand Puritan or Separatist, was nonetheless compelled to leave
England twice, and also had trouble conforming with the Puritan theocracies in
the colonies. It’s like so many things in life, where the devil is in the
details, and religion was a realm for political maneuvering, openly or behind
the scenes. One of the areas of contention in the Church of England of Hull’s
time was about what was allowed on Sundays. King James published in 1618 a Book of Sports stating that archery,
dancing, leaping, vaulting, May games, Whitsun ales, Morris dances, Maypoles,
and the decorating of the church with rushes or greenery were permitted, but
not bear or bull baiting or bowling. This was aimed at the Puritans who wanted much
stricter behavior for Sundays. It also required that only those who had been to
church could participate, leaving out the Catholics. The church calendars had a
lot of saint’s days and other reasons for holding parish ales or revels. The
church would use these events as fundraisers, providing the ale, and then use
those funds to keep up the churches and to donate to the poor; this meant they had
less reason to look to the Bishops or local tithes for full support. The
typical Sunday was spent with sports and “revels” that many ministers considered
good for the community, and on religious holidays there would be more extensive
celebrations. Charles I, under whose reign the Puritans faced much greater
persecution, re-issued James’ Book of
Sports and included the holding of wakes as allowed. Preaching was not a
part of the established liturgy; the minister was limited to the Book of Common Prayer without expounding
on it. The Church establishment was afraid that without the sports and revels,
people would attend sermons or sit together in their homes discussing religion
or, worse, politics, things bound to lead to dissension. Bishop Pierce, Hull’s
bishop, sought to suppress activities like preaching on Sunday afternoons or
evenings, or to attend such sermons or talk about them afterwards. Pierce
condemned a minister who had two sermons on a Sunday that conflicted with a
Church ale. Another man was questioned because he preached on the day of a
revel based on a verse from Joel and fasting, weeping, and mourning as the way
to approach God, undermining enjoyment of the revel.
Hull’s intellectual interest
in theology and his willingness to preach when and where he could, and to encourage
discussions with the people who heard his teaching, put him at odds with the
Bishop and those seeking to stop the tide of change in the Church of England.
He had a Puritan spirit in that he wished the Church to change, but he was not enough
of a Puritan to satisfy those of the Massachusetts Bay Colony. The very fact
that he was accepted by the people in Accominticus was one of the reasons
Winthrop gave for taking Maine into the Massachusetts Bay Colony in 1643. The
people of the Maine colonies were generally seen by the dour Puritans as
encouraging public merriment, maypoles, morris dances, wassails, drinking in
general, and dress that was not austere. That Hull could minister to these
people made him a target for Winthrop.
Samuel Hull Sr. (1649-1734) 7xggf
Samuel was the
youngest of three Hull brothers who left New Hampshire to settle
Piscataway, NJ in the 1660s-1670s. The middle brother, Benjamin, was a
successful innkeeper whose license is dated 1678, but his line does not cross
into South territory nor does Hopewell’s, the oldest brother who was among the first four settlers in Piscataway. Samuel was born in 1649
to Rev. Joseph Hull and his wife Agnes, most likely in Accomenticus (later
York) Maine. Monette lists him with the early settlers of Piscataway, and gives
a date of 1673; he is tied to various land acquisitions, some called patents
which would indicate they came from the original grant. Monette also lists
Samuel Hull as a resident of early Woodbridge in 1669; we know from the map
attached to Thomas South’s section that Piscataway and Woodbridge were
quite close to each other. Monette also mentions that Samuel lived on Doties
Creek; there was a Doty family in the area, and in fact his daughter Elizabeth
married a Doty. Samuel’s own marriage to Mary
Manning (1663-1692) 7xggm is recorded in many sources as well as Monette’s
to have been on 16 Oct. 1677. They had eight children, including the first son who carries our line forward, Samuel Jr. In 1685 he was coroner at the
inquest regarding the death of Hopewell’s servant who drowned in the Rariton. In
a document dated 1696 he is called a cooper, one who would make barrels,
buckets, tubs, churns, and the like with wooden staves and metal rings. He is
recorded in various deed transactions and as a creditor to Francis Drake in
1687 and to John Bonne in 1714. His death is given as “after 1734.”
Samuel Hull Jr. (1683-1761) 6xggf and wife Margaret There
are 5 Ancestry DNA matches with Samuel Hull,Jr. as common ancestor for Bob, me,
or Michael Wilson-South.
I have not been
able to find a lot of information with any good documentation about Samuel Hull,
Jr. Many early Hull family genealogies placed his birth as 1703, but that is incorrect. He is mentioned in the classic American Genealogical-Biographical Index or
AGBI, but that is just a name and colony. A New Jersey Census of 1741 placed him not far from Piscataway, but
in another county, and gives Maidenhead Township as the location; that is 13
miles from Amwell, given as both his birthplace and the place of his death.
Amwell is only 21 miles from Piscataway. There is record of a will which
mentions wife Margaret—who is often given as Margaret Mundy, but that is most likely incorrect—and his children. Samuel's will mentions Johanna Hull South by name. The will of Margaret, Feb. 1, 1768, provides evidence that
she lived seven years beyond Samuel. In New
Jersey, Abstract of Wills, 1670-1817 it has the abstract of her will giving
her residence as Amwell, NJ; she divides her property between her daughters
Patience Williamson, Margaret Thatcher, Mary Ann Cane, and Johanna Hull South (1734-?) 5xggm; sons Moses, Gershom, John, and
Daniel Hull get 6 shillings each. The will was proved Jan. 26, 1769. Son-in-law
Edmund South (1718-1785) 5xggf is mentioned
by name as receiving over 7 pounds.
Resources
https://kindredconnection.wordpress.com/2018/02/19/joseph-hull/ Nice blog by K.T.
Cole with lots of good documented information; makes my blog look shabby
https://www.hullfamilyassociation.org/genealogist_errors_joseph.shtml
Mistakes page for Joseph Hull researchers; this group has definite opinions about what's true and what is not
http://www.metacirque.com/laurencecook/genes/bicknell/bicknellnotes.html
Cook’s website with a nice concise explanation of the forces of Reformation and
Church of England history during Rev. Hull’s time. I must say that Cook could use a good Grammar
Nazi editor, but the information is sound.
https://www.weymouth.ma.us/history/pages/first-hundred-years Article about the failed settlements before
Hull
https://archive.org/details/revjosephhullsom00hull Amy Hull’s 1904 Rev. Joseph Hull and some of his descendants available online
https://ascendingthestairs.wordpress.com/2012/05/09/neither-fish-nor-fowl-rev-joseph-hull-part-i/ Nice
blog with links to two other parts about Rev. Joseph Hull
http://homepages.rpi.edu/~holmes/Hobbies/Genealogy2/ps12/ps12_126.htm genealogy by Mark Holmes with some
interesting notes; says that Hopewell and Samuel were Quakers and calls
Piscataway a Quaker colony
https://books.google.com/books?id=I0YVAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA216&dq=hopewell+hull&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiSxvn7mr_aAhWJxVQKHbQjAdsQ6AEIKTAA#v=onepage&q=hopewell%20hull&f=false
Francis Bazley Lee’s New Jersey as a
Colony and as a State online
https://books.google.com/books?id=mEYVAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA194&dq=hopewell+hull+piscataway&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiRgK-IvL3aAhWKwVQKHZKkA0kQ6AEIKzAA#v=onepage&q=hopewell%20&f=false Andrew Melick’s The Story of an Old Farm: Or, Life in New Jersey in the Eighteenth Century
online
https://books.google.com/books?id=ADIUAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA63&lpg=PA63&dq=first+grand+jury+in+piscataway,+nj+hopewell+hull&source=bl&ots=oIrCsm2LuR&sig=avfvldeQa1uy1hYUS2qJTB4cW1U&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi2sMLEvb_aAhWpjFQKHdKQCDcQ6AEINTAC#v=onepage&q=first%20grand%20jury%20in%20piscataway%2C%20nj%20hopewell%20hull&f=false John
Patrick Wall’s History of Middlesex County, New Jersey, 1664-1920 online.
https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.35112103455855;view=1up;seq=272
online access New Jersey Colonial
Documents 1899 with reference to
Thomas as cooper
https://books.google.com/books?id=1ZgYZ0Qr1IgC&pg=PA148&lpg=PA148&dq=samuel+hull+piscataway&source=bl&ots=6JPRftLgxF&sig=bP2thD_HsmvHBgdmqZlbsIJzue0&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwioiIOevLfaAhXM0J8KHfn5AoIQ6AEIPzAF#v=onepage&q=samuel%20hull%20piscataway&f=false online access to American Marriage Records before 1699 by William M. Clemens with
Samuel Hull’s marriage to Mary Manning
http://www.lawrencetwp.com/history.html
Site saying that Maidenhead is now Lawrence Township, NJ
https://archive.org/stream/hullfamilyinamer00weyg#page/95/mode/2up The
Hull Family In America by Col. Weygant, 1903, online.
Freas, Margarey Huston. “Which Samuel Hull Had Patience?” The American Genealogist,Vol. 63, October, 1994. This article clarified the birth date of Samuel Hull, Jr.




No comments:
Post a Comment